Resolusi Konflik Antar Organ Pengurus Yayasan: Studi Kasus Konflik Yayasan Pendidikan Al-Ijtihad Kota Tangerang
Abstract
This research uses Lewis Coser's Social Conflict theory by focusing on the conflict resolution process in the world of educational organizations or foundations. The approach used in this research is a qualitative approach and case study method. The researcher focuses on the course of the conflict involving various parties within the foundation, as well as resolution as an effort to resolve the conflict. Data collection in this research was carried out using in-depth interviews with parties involved in the conflict, analysis of related documents, and direct observation. The results of the research show that the factors that trigger conflict at YAPENSI Al-Ijtihad are differences in interests between its management organs, as a result of which it has the impact of conflict on the foundation with losses experienced by the Foundation. As a resolution effort to achieve a resolution of the conflict YAPENSI brought this conflict into the realm of law to prevent a bigger conflict. This research provides in-depth insight into the dynamics of conflict in educational foundations and the importance of conflict resolution to maintain the stability and smooth operation of foundations.
References
Cholili, Azwar. (2015). Studi Ekploratori Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Konflik di Yayasan Al-Fatah Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 4(2).
Chotimah, Chusnul. (2015). Respon Masyarakat Tentang Keberadaan Kandang Ayam dalam Tinjauan Konflik Lewis Coser di Dusun Sumuralas Desa Gajah Kecamatan Baureno Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel.
Harahap, Afrizal, & Azwar. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Sosial PT Asam Jawa kepada Komunitas Terdampak Sebagai Strategi Pengelolaan Konflik Sosial. Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 7 (3).
Janji, Bionerges May Langga dkk. (2015). Teori Konflik Lewis A. Coser..
Suparno, Paul. (2016). Konflik Antar Organ Yayasan dan Dampaknya Bagi Perkembangan Pendidikan. Educare. 2 (13).
Tualeka, Nur Wahid. (2017). Teori Konflik Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. Jurnal Al-Hikmah, 3(1).
Zainuddin. (2022). Islah dalam Pemahaman Qur’an Hadis. Jurnal Ilmiah Al Mu’ashirah, 19(2).
Ali, Chidir. (1991). Badan Hukum. Bandung: PT Alumni
Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Standford University Press.
Dolye P. Johnson. (1986). Teori Sosiologi Modern 2. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Jary, J,. & David. (1991). Sosiology Dictionary. New York: HarperCollins.
K.J. Veeger. (1993). Realitas Sosial. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Lyamouri, Nadine, dkk. (2012). Youth Transforming Conflict. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
McQuarrie, Donald. 1995. Reading in Contemporary Sociological Theory From Modernity To Post-Modenity. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Peter, Berger,. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Penguin Books.
Poloma, Margaret. (1979). Contemporary Sociological Theory. New York: Macmillan School Sivision.
Pruitt, Dean G,. & Rubin. (2004). Teori Konflik Sosial. Terj. Helly, P, dkk. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Simmel, George. (2009). Sociology: Inquiries Into The Construction of Social Forms (Volume 2). Terj, Anthony, J, dkk. Leiden: Brill.
Susan, Novri. (2009). Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu-Isu Konflik Kontemporer. Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Wirawan, I. B.(2012). Teori-Teori Sosial dalam Tiga Paradigma (Fakta Sosial, Definisi Sosial, dan Perilaku Sosial). Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Wulansari, Dewi (2009). Sosiologi Konsep dan Teori. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 Tentang Yayasan
Undang-Undang Nomor 28 tahun 2004 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 Tentang Yayasan.
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Nomor 38/PDT/2022/PT BTN Tanggal 9 Maret 2021.
.png)
.png)
